Hovell and Hume The Sydney Morning
Herald 9 July 1924 |
Sir, Mr.
John Adrian wrote to "bring retired teachers" (and many other
people's) knowledge of the Hume-Hovell Journey up to date." Mr.
Alex. Wilson merely ventured to gently correct a "Retired School
Teacher." Neither
of these gentlemen counted on the forces of Miss Mary B. J. Yeo. I
do not know how Mr. Adrian is still licking his wounds, but the yeoman's
lance appears as effective as in the past ages, for in a blind return Mr.
Wilson hits the Yass school kiddies under the belt. Mr.
Adrian says he is up to date on the Hume-Hovell Journey, but Mr. Wilson
admits being still in the dark, and shows an inclination to read still
further. It
may be that after further literary effort that he may come to the conclusion
that, like Mr. Adrian, there is really nothing more for him to learn on the
subject. In
order that he may be able to "gently" assert himself among the
Australian school kiddies generally (there can be no gentle conditions
expected where the Yass school kiddies are concerned). Mr.
Wilson had, perhaps, better read Fitchett and Long
in the Sydney Public Library. He may also find Sutherland and other
Australian history books there. Either
the Australian school children have been wrongly instructed or Messrs. Adrian
and Wilson have "a heap to learn." The
school books tell of continual quarrels, while Messrs. Adrian and Wilson
proclaim harmony. The
school history details indicate a generally dominant Hume a genius explorer,
and a superb bushman. Hovell,
with his professional training, wanted to keep in a straight line, which
meant crossing mountains in an easterly direction. Hume,
with his bushman's instinct, wanted to make a westerly detour along the
plains. Was
it Hovell's fault that so much mountainous country was crossed? Hovell
may have been badly treated by the children's historians, but he is generally
represented as petulant and ineffective. As
your Albury correspondent kept putting Hovell first, it naturally got on the
nerves of a good many. Fancy
writing about the discovery of the Murray, and then putting the actual
discoverer's name second! Rightly
or wrongly, one comes to the conclusion that there has been a continued
effort to rob Hume of the pride of place. I am, etc.. Cumnock, July 5. A. Retired Teacher. |