Port Phillip adventurers The Australian 25 October 1836 |
We direct our readers to the letter of "A Friend to Colonization," which appears in another column. We quite agree with the writer on this subject, and come readily to
the same conclusion with himself - namely, that the Port Phillip adventurers
have encountered considerable risk and some actual loss in carrying into
effect their new scheme of colonization, and that they may fairly look for a reward
of their enterprise that is in some degree commensurate with their outlay in
these points. We have all along expressed the same opinion, and can only hope that
the eyes of those in authority may recognise, the same features in the case. As for the letter of "A Grazier," to which our Correspondent refers,
nothing can be more preposterous and absurd than the supposition that this
Colony has a right to dispose of and parcel out the remainder of this
continent for her own advantage. If the Grazier and his brethren, whether at Moneroo, the Murrumbidgee, or anywhere else, think that
they have the least claim to the acres of Port Phillip - one whit better
title to them than the Vandemonian speculators, or
than anyone else, we should be happy to hear upon what they found their
pretensions? Is it upon the fact of their having illegally (that is without
the sanction of the law) squatted for years without let or hindrance, and
without payment, on those distant plains? Is it that they have embarked their property in that quarter? So have the Port Phillip adventurers, and at much greater cost. There
is no other consideration in the shape of a right that our ingenuity can
discover for the Grazier and his co-claimants. Whether Port Phillip will be attached to this Government or to that of
Van Diemen's Land, as our Corresponnent seems to
believe, matters very little - for neither Government will have the modesty
to fall in with "A Grazier's" views, and turn the universal soil of
Australia, and the labors of the universal race of adventurers, to its
individual benefit. There will be indirect advantage enough to both, accruing from, the
formation of a prosperous settlement so near at hand - and if we were to
repeat for a thousand times more that it is the plain policy of the powers
that be to encourage, by every possible means, the present and all future
cases of new occupation, we should only appear to attach a sufficient degree
of importance to the fact - and should find that our reiteration was not
impertinent, nor our labor thrown away, if we found that our views of the
subject were taken up by those who could carry them into effect. The general opinion of the well-informed of the community is that the
free, grant system applied for a season to the new colony would be in the
greatest degree politic. There are hundreds who would shift their flocks and herds to that
locality at once, upon the announcement that this was conceded; and few
months would elapse before a high road was marked out and traversed, with our
flocks daily making their way to those green pastures. The result would be in one respect, and in one alone, disadvantageous
to this Colony - and this evil would be, before twelve months were over,
overcome by consequent advantages; the receipts from crown land sales and the
shipment of wool from hence, would be diminished, and a portion of our
population would travel away to the new port; these evils are scarcely more
than imaginary, though we have heard greater stress laid upon them; the rapid
growth of Port Phillip into importance would afford us a market infinitely
more valuable than the paltry gains arising from the above sources. But the encouragement of Free Grants must be conceded with moderation;
nothing in the shape of the demands of the Port Phillip Deputations - of
Messrs. Gellibrand and Swanston, or of Mr. Dobson, we have every objection to
their success, from a conviction of its bad effect upon the growth and
prosperity of the new Colony. |