Tumut
River Protection Measures Essential May 16,
2000 Tumut & Adelong Times |
Local
fishing enthusiasts, concerned at the effect on the district's tourist
industry from continuing DLWC works to the Tumut River, are actively lobbying
a number of proposals which they consider would alleviate what they regard as
significant damage being caused to the river's habitat. They
are calling on the department not to disturb a number of gravel bars, not to
rock the inside of bends, and put in baffle zones on long flat fast runs, and
off rock walls. They
are also calling on the Tumut River Advisory Committee to endeavour for water
release cutbacks to be achieved more slowly, reopen some closed offshoots
(such as the "cockatoo" delta), and replace some hardwood trees
removed two years ago from the Nimbo anabranch. The
fishing groups State that the gravel bars are a key habitat, and if moved the
food chain and ecology of the river would be severely interfered with, and
would not recover. "They must not be allowed to he destroyed." last
week's Advisory Committee was told. Amongst
those considered particularly significant are the gravel bars just above the Goobragandra confluence, at Mill Angle, both sides of the
Old Town Bridge, and at the Riverglade caravan
park. It
was also told there was a strong feeling against any rocking of inside beds
stemming from the belief it was the "thin edge of the wedge" to
rocking both sides, giving a canal effect. On
the subject of a more gradual cutback to releases, the Advisory Committee was
told that the fishing groups would like to see this done at 250 megalitres per hour rather than 500 megalitres
an hour to avoid tiny bottom dwellers being left high and dry on gravelled
sections. It
was also suggested stumps removed from Mill Angle two years ago should be
replaced, and a tree on the edge of the main flow in the same vicinity should
also be retained. It
was told flows below old Jones' Bridge, Junction Bridge and opposite the
racecourse were some of the areas that required baffle-like buffer zones on
long fast runs of the river. It
was also suggested that the department advertise its proposed river works a
month in advertise its proposed river works a month in advance, explaining
when and where the schedule would be carried out, and why they were
considered necessary. |